<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 3.16 Billion Cycles	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/</link>
	<description>Che-Wei Wang (last update 2013) Visit cwandt.com for the latest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mieux que l&#8217;Atmos, l&#8217;horloge 3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; Above Luxe		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mieux que l&#8217;Atmos, l&#8217;horloge 3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; Above Luxe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...]   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]   [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; Life, the Universe and Everything &#124; Alphaverse.com		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; Life, the Universe and Everything &#124; Alphaverse.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the designers write up: Can we watch decay? Can we see glass as a fluid slowly slumping and deforming over time? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the designers write up: Can we watch decay? Can we see glass as a fluid slowly slumping and deforming over time? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cwwang.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time in Six Parts		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cwwang.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time in Six Parts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 05.05  3.16 Billion Cycles   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 05.05  3.16 Billion Cycles   [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vita brevis, ars longa auf betonblog.de		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vita brevis, ars longa auf betonblog.de]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] das w&#252;rden wir gerne erleben, wie der Stahlring des K&#252;nstlers Che-Wei Wang nach 3.16 Milliarden Umdrehungen zu Boden [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] das w&#252;rden wir gerne erleben, wie der Stahlring des K&#252;nstlers Che-Wei Wang nach 3.16 Milliarden Umdrehungen zu Boden [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; curiosity killed hec		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3.16 Billion Cycles &#124; curiosity killed hec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] â€˜3.16 Billion Cyclesâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> is a clock designed by Che-Wei Wang. 1 cycle takes 1 seconds, 3.16 billion cycles will take 100 years. After that time the clock will fall apart due to the gap in the outer arc.  A 60 rpm (revolutions per minute) motor drives the entire mechanism. It rotates once every second. The following pulley rotates once every 5 seconds (1:5 ratio). The next rotates once every 60 seconds or 1 minute. Then 5 minutes, 1 hour, 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, and 1 decade. The decade wheel carries the load of the large arc. The large arc rotates once every century. The final ratio between the 60 rpm motor and the large arc is approximately 1:31.6 billion. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] â€˜3.16 Billion Cyclesâ€™ is a clock designed by Che-Wei Wang. 1 cycle takes 1 seconds, 3.16 billion cycles will take 100 years. After that time the clock will fall apart due to the gap in the outer arc.  A 60 rpm (revolutions per minute) motor drives the entire mechanism. It rotates once every second. The following pulley rotates once every 5 seconds (1:5 ratio). The next rotates once every 60 seconds or 1 minute. Then 5 minutes, 1 hour, 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, and 1 decade. The decade wheel carries the load of the large arc. The large arc rotates once every century. The final ratio between the 60 rpm motor and the large arc is approximately 1:31.6 billion. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Time in Six Parts - Che-Wei Wang&#8217;s 3.16 Billion Cycles, In a Lifetime, Cinematic Timepiece, One Hour Sprocket, Thermal Clock and Counting to a Billion &#124; watchist.com		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Time in Six Parts - Che-Wei Wang&#8217;s 3.16 Billion Cycles, In a Lifetime, Cinematic Timepiece, One Hour Sprocket, Thermal Clock and Counting to a Billion &#124; watchist.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 3.16 Billion Cycles is a clock that unravels a century through a series of pulleys. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 3.16 Billion Cycles is a clock that unravels a century through a series of pulleys. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 3.16 Billion Cycles - today and tomorrow		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3.16 Billion Cycles - today and tomorrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;3.16 Billion Cycles&#8221; is a clock designed by Che-Wei Wang. 1 cycle takes 1 seconds, 3.16 billion cycles will take 100 years. After that time the clock will fall apart due to the gap in the outer arc.  A 60 rpm (revolutions per minute) motor drives the entire mechanism. It rotates once every second. The following pulley rotates once every 5 seconds (1:5 ratio). The next rotates once every 60 seconds or 1 minute. Then 5 minutes, 1 hour, 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, and 1 decade. The decade wheel carries the load of the large arc. The large arc rotates once every century. The final ratio between the 60 rpm motor and the large arc is approximately 1:31.6 billion. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;3.16 Billion Cycles&#8221; is a clock designed by Che-Wei Wang. 1 cycle takes 1 seconds, 3.16 billion cycles will take 100 years. After that time the clock will fall apart due to the gap in the outer arc.  A 60 rpm (revolutions per minute) motor drives the entire mechanism. It rotates once every second. The following pulley rotates once every 5 seconds (1:5 ratio). The next rotates once every 60 seconds or 1 minute. Then 5 minutes, 1 hour, 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, and 1 decade. The decade wheel carries the load of the large arc. The large arc rotates once every century. The final ratio between the 60 rpm motor and the large arc is approximately 1:31.6 billion. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Long Now Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3.16 Billion Cycles		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Long Now Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 3.16 Billion Cycles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the designers write up: Can we watch decay? Can we see glass as a fluid slowly slumping and deforming over time? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the designers write up: Can we watch decay? Can we see glass as a fluid slowly slumping and deforming over time? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zegarek stuletni: ponad 3 miliardy obrotÃ³w w 100 lat - GadÅ¼etomania.pl - gadÅ¼ety, nowoÅ›ci techniczne, nowoÅ›ci technologiczne, nowoÅ›ci komputerowe		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zegarek stuletni: ponad 3 miliardy obrotÃ³w w 100 lat - GadÅ¼etomania.pl - gadÅ¼ety, nowoÅ›ci techniczne, nowoÅ›ci technologiczne, nowoÅ›ci komputerowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] ktÃ³rego autorem jest Che-Wei Wang, napÄ<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />dzany jest silniczkiem wykonujÄ…cycm 60 obrotÃ³w na minutÄ<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />. Kolejne koÅ‚o, po zastosowaniu [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ktÃ³rego autorem jest Che-Wei Wang, napÄ™dzany jest silniczkiem wykonujÄ…cycm 60 obrotÃ³w na minutÄ™. Kolejne koÅ‚o, po zastosowaniu [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tudza		</title>
		<link>/2009/05/05/316-billion-cycles/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tudza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwwang.com/?p=1090#comment-270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You think the electric motor or the belts are good for 100 years?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think the electric motor or the belts are good for 100 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
